The article states plainly that this is likely due to heavy investment from the porn industry to protect their revenue streams. Religious organizations aren't typically for-profit ventures, so with less at stake doesn't this kinda make sense? Or is this just some excuse to draw some value judgment between porn and God?
Try not to lose perspective of the less technically inclined end-users. We might not be the target audience of an article like this, but perhaps the layperson surfing the Internet wouldn't realize how relatively dangerous browsing a religious website might be to their computer.
Does that mean it shouldn't have been posted here? Probably.
