Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Shorter term (e.g. next century or so) there's also the easy option of just storing it somewhere safe and keeping an eye on it. There's so little of the waste, by volume, that it's not too hard to manage. The advantages of this scheme are:

1. It's easy. It's what we're doing right now.

2. It lets us recycle the slightly used fuel that comes out of our reactors.

Nuclear waste is not useless. Waste from conventional reactors is mostly usable as fuel, but mining it is cheap enough that this recycling isn't economically compelling yet. Our nuclear waste stockpile can be thought of as a strategic nuclear fuel reserve: a valuable resource set aside for the future.



'Someplace safe' would be the Trinity site. It's already irradiated, owned by the government, and no one is ever going to live there.

I now this, you know this ... preaching to the choir.

Bombarding the moon would have the side effect of kick-starting a space program, however.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: