I'm not proposing mandatory voting, but you have to fix turnout somehow or just openly acknowledge that you're running on a non-democratic system.
> Second, the voters may not have been qualified; they did not use the site enough to be able to or care to select one moderator over another.
This is exactly the attitude I'm talking about. I think the dedicated core actually does believe this: that nothing is broken, it's okay that the outgroup doesn't vote because they'd just ruin things if they did.
> Second, the voters may not have been qualified; they did not use the site enough to be able to or care to select one moderator over another.
This is exactly the attitude I'm talking about. I think the dedicated core actually does believe this: that nothing is broken, it's okay that the outgroup doesn't vote because they'd just ruin things if they did.