Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43900231 and marked it offtopic.

Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


I assume you mean the Pythagorean theorem, and by description you mean equation?


I was trying to be vague to see how pedantic the audience here is when the meaning of a statement can be easily inferred from context. Seems very.


I think there’s probably already enough information out there to see how pedantic the typical audience is here ;)


"I was only pretending to be stupid!"


Being vague/ambiguous and sounding stupid are two different things.


What? "The longest side of a triangle" isn't a challenging concept to understand or describe.


(from the nearby toilet cubicle) "That's a right triangle, ya idiot!"


D'oh!


[remarkably incorrect answer misunderstanding the above comments]


Who are you talking about? The entire claim was "there was no reasonable description for hypotenuse length before the theorem"; I assume the Pythagorean theorem is intended. But that claim is crazy. You just contradicted it yourself.

I should note that hypotenuses look no different in 126 dimensions than they do in 2 - three points determine a plane, regardless of how big the space containing the plane might be - but that's not really relevant to anything here.


Sorry, yes, that was a major misunderstanding of the previous comment by me. I am utterly wrong!


(The longest side of a right triangle)


If you believe that you can only subtend a 90 degree angle, sure.

("Subtend" is a direct part-for-part translation of the verb which also gives us the name "hypotenuse".)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: