On: US appeals court rules AI generated art cannot be copyrighted

[Suppafly]

>You better be willing to question whether photographs can be copyrightable at all, because they are all result of several mechanical systems not created by the camera operator.

That is a good point that a lot of people don't want to address. A lot of the 'creative' part of the process is actually being done by the software in the camera.

[SiempreViernes → Suppafly]

No, that's the opposite of my point: what the camera does is mechanical work, it is explicitly not creative.