Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The administration doesn’t give a shit about the web, and DOJ is a fully political entity. They’ll extort Google for whatever concession they want, and Chrome will remain.



They'll demand half of Google's rare earths deposits


Or just the keys to total surveillance and suppression of web content they don't like.


Why would they need to do that when they already have the formula down? How much have you been hearing about all the protests?


Things are going to get more heated as the voluntary economic downturn heats up. The current protests get some coverage but we’re starting to see even the loyalists realize that they won’t be spared, and that is likely to increase protests considerably.


Why wouldn't they?

Also they have the have the formula because they've already done it. And it works, why wouldn't they want to keep doing it, but more?


Well now to be fair, total surveillance and suppression of any content they don't like is worth a whole lot more than rare earth deposits to a government.


Google would just need to buy many Trump coins on the next drop. If he ever got Russian money, that was a great opportunity for it.


Biden or Trump administration? This remedy was originally proposed under Biden's DOJ.


It’s still around and the admin continued it.

Biden’s DOJ was slooooooowly pursuing anti-trust more seriously. That’s not a Trump priority. So what’s the reason?


You are probably right.


[flagged]


Do you want to cite a source?


[flagged]


I honestly don't see what the issue is. "Pressuring" in this case just means "asking". Nobody was punished for not fulfilling these requests.

And funding research grants into studying misinformation doesn't really bother me either. Maybe there are better ways to spend the money but you could argue that about almost anything.

Also, none of what you linked points to the Biden administration paying tech companies to remove content.


[flagged]


2nd link contains no such information. Nowhere in the article does it say tech companies were paid to censor anything.


You are right my apologies. It only says we paid a quarter of a billion dollars to “study” which in this case meant paying for “non profits” to comb through a bunch of nobodies posts online in addition to paying for government employees to be on site at twitter specifically.

So you’re right it doesn’t say the directly cut a check. Only paid for people to find it. Paid for the people to communicate the offending posts to the social media companies.

In addition to all this the Biden admin “coerced and pressured”.

I won’t accept this if trump does it and I won’t accept Biden having done it. I cannot fathom how anyone would, given how quickly the winds have changed in America. It should be painfully obvious that the tools “your side” uses will be used by your political enemies.


There is still no evidence that SARS CoV 2 was leaked from Chinese BSL4 lab in Wuhan because evidence links virus to Russian BSL4 lab «Vector». For example, first report for atypical pneumonia with rate of 100 cases per day (700 per week) was on Oct 16 in Russia as reported by newspaper «Аргументы и факты на Енисее» №42. Many Russians medics had immunity to Covid19 already when epidemic started, as shown by their antibodies.


The constitution establishes that a core role of government is to provide for the general welfare of the people, and public health is part of that. I’m generally in favor with government efforts to combat misinformation.

I’m also fine with wartime propaganda within limits for similar reasons.


And after 9/11, wartime is all the time. Still enjoying the constant propaganda?


Given the dreadful state of public health this is a total fail. Epidemic obesity alone is a nightmare: heart disease, cancer, stroke, you name it.

Trump, to his credit, is taking fentanyl seriously but heart disease is a bigger killer.


but heart disease is a bigger killer

Can't blame Mexico and China for heart disease. So it's of little political value. A government will take on public health challenges whose root causes can be used to confer political value. Other public health challenges may be more serious, but they are worthless to a politician.

That's actually why politicians shouldn't be in charge of those sorts of things.


I am not fine with war time propaganda. I want to know what the government is choosing to do and why.

I am not against war and even the occasional puff piece about how sexy the latest military tech is sexy is fine. It still is necessary in this day and age to stomp those that strip others of human rights and lives, yet I cannot think of any military action since Vietnam I have felt comfortable that I have not been outright lied to about underlying causes, methods used, and the after affects.

My full adult life it has seemed the government is convinced it is the Illuminati with a mandate to gaslight the public. That bad decisions don’t matter and no one is responsible seems like a horrible status quo when lives, the environment, and our tax dollars are at stake.

9/11 turned wartime propaganda into an excuse to strip freedoms that certain parties have been lusting after and no promises were kept about timelines for them being returned. When trust is abused to that extent the government should lose any rights to do so again.


Aaaand that is why trump won.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: