your character is relevant because it's tied to how you choose to define what 'works'. i agree with your other comment making cash = making cash. but thats not what you said, you said works, which implies your only definition of working is making cash. i'm challenging that, i'm saying you get to choose how you define what works, and your choice of what 'works' means, is determined by your values.
It's not about me, it's about accepting a shady company as a success so long as they accomplish their goal of making cash. Im making the case that there's more to a successful company than just making cash. We shouldnt be impressed simply because a company makes cash. It's not about superiority, just stating a challenging point of view. No need to take it personally.
You are the one that made it personal. saraid216 said that Zynga is getting what Zynga wants and you immediately pretended saraid216 was saying that it was something Zynga 'should' do and we couldn't criticize Zynga for it. Then you directly insulted saraid216's character. Get off your high horse and stop reacting to things people didn't say or mean.
You don't have to pretend someone disagrees with you just so you can post your point.
