Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> not low for the average person, but not that expensive either

I think this is very high for the average person.






But not for someone thinking their £2m house will “lose value”

There are a lot of rich people in the U.K.


I don't understand this sort of response. The context is the average person. What do you mean in that context?

It doesn't matter about the average person if it only takes one successful objection to stop a project.

I think you misread it. The context was, _not low_ (ie. high) for the average person. For someone with a higher than average wealth however, £5k isn't all that much, especially if it could potentially protect the value of their assets

I was referring to the "not that expensive".

Maybe I misread it then. I interpreted it as "not low for the average person, but not that expensive _for someone with greater than average wealth_"

Yes, that's how I intended it.

Of course, but I think a country can't survive long term if it's focused on raising the property prices of those with already expansive houses especially given the demographic slowdown/collapse. Or am I crazy?

I'd wager that for the sort of person who has the desire to care deeply about stopping windmills being built (perhaps feeling a need to 'conserve' the old way of doing things), instead of say, worrying about putting food on the table - this is pocket change.



Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: