I guess I'm more interested in the how rather than the why. The why is kind of a given.
After Ukraine runs out of fodder for the meat-grinder (already on the verge of this now) who's children get sent to Ukraine? If we are not going to give Ukraine sufficient support to win the war, only prolong it, what is the timeline and the actual endgame?
To be clear, I'm not supporting Russia, I'm asking in clear terms, what exactly should the response be?
Why are you moving the goalposts? I responded to your comment asking what if things go too good for Ukraine. Not sure how 'but what if things go bad' is a reasoned follow up on your part. :
"What happens if Ukraine is given sufficient support to start winning and Putin decides to go nuclear?
I don't want Russia to win either but we also have to operate in reality."
After Ukraine runs out of fodder for the meat-grinder (already on the verge of this now) who's children get sent to Ukraine? If we are not going to give Ukraine sufficient support to win the war, only prolong it, what is the timeline and the actual endgame?
To be clear, I'm not supporting Russia, I'm asking in clear terms, what exactly should the response be?