Please don't build another 'You should "upgrade" your browser to Chrome' service.
WebRTC might be cool, the demo looks cool, but the official site says that it might break or go away anytime and - please, please, please never ignore this - only one single browser seems to support that tech.
Fool around with it, but this can _never_ be part of a Skype killer until everyone can use it.
You are aware that Skype requires the Skype client, even less standards-based than Chrome, and everyone can use it?
You can use Chrome and Skype alongside your web browser of choice. Chrome is spritually like the Mozilla/XUL of old -- it's a platform for apps, not just a web browser.
Sure beats a "you should install our binary" service. WebRTC is also an open standard backed by the W3C and will have support in other browsers soon (FireFox/Opera/IE, no word yet from Apple).
Support is already being added in Firefox. Skype posted a position a while back about a WebRTC hire. I'm not sure why people act like it's some fringe thing. It's already not.
step 1 - download dev version of chrome into a separate folder
step 2 - enable webrtc in flags://
step 3 - put a shortcut on your Desktop that points to this and says "Skype-NG" or something like that.
How is that different now than going and clicking on Skype from running and launching point of view. Bonus points, can also browse the web if you want.
Skype also might break or might go away anytime too. Or, rather, more likely will interrupt your video stream every 5 minutes to show you adds about dating sites and Nigerian scams.
Someone could (and should!) take the webrtc c++ libraries and use those to create their own native client app -- which would not be dependent on the Chrome browser.
WebRTC might be cool, the demo looks cool, but the official site says that it might break or go away anytime and - please, please, please never ignore this - only one single browser seems to support that tech.
Fool around with it, but this can _never_ be part of a Skype killer until everyone can use it.