On: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

[ncr100]

No. The current GOP administration, starting from before this election:

- supported funding Project 2025's development by GOP members

- talked about Project 2025 favorably

- saw Project 2025 demonized by the media

- THEN denied they support Project 2025

- got elected using Project 2025 tactics

- hired Project 2025 author INTO this new administration

- are currently implementing Project 2025 policies.

SO "THEY ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT 2025" seems closer to "true" and "fact" than unlikely.

[theultdev → ncr100]

Please find me a clip where Trump supported Project 2025, I'll wait.

In every instance, he has said he is not affiliated with it and doesn't support it as a whole.

Now there are some agendas in Project 2025 that are fine, some that are pretty out there. So yeah there will be overlap in policies.

Just wanted to point out you were wrong about their strategy. There's a name for it it's called "Flood the zone" and it's older than Project 2025.

[filoeleven → theultdev]

https://www.project2025.observer/

Trump is either in charge and actively supporting its goals, or he is not really in charge and is being duped into supporting its goals. “Some overlap” is an understatement, especially only this far into his presidency. They’re doing exactly what they said they would.

[Andrew6rant → theultdev]

> Please find me a clip where Trump supported Project 2025, I'll wait.

Trump said parts of Project 2025 are "very good" in Dec 2024. Can't link a clip right now as I'm at lunch at work, but it should be easy to find

[theultdev → Andrew6rant]

Yes, and some parts are very good. He also said some parts are not very good in the same statement.

That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.

[thr0w4w47 → theultdev]

> That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.

I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed that he supports the entire agenda.

[theultdev → thr0w4w47]

Okay. We're all good then.

[buttercraft → theultdev]

>> Please find me a clip where Trump supported Project 2025, I'll wait

> That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.

You're moving the goalposts.

[theultdev → buttercraft]

The original post in this thread was about their breakneck speed.

Project 2025 was misattributed to this, it's called "Flood the Zone".

Everything after that is just noise.

[thr0w4w47 → theultdev]

> Please find me a clip where Trump supported Project 2025, I'll wait.

So someone can only be accused of supporting something if it is caught on video?

[theultdev → thr0w4w47]

Supporting evidence certainly helps when accusing someone.