If AGI means "artificial general intelligence", wouldn't that need to exist?
The thesis of the article is that knowing stuff is not useful when the machine knows it for us.
But the topic is worth considering. If a machine has university-graduate level understanding of knowledge, anyone who needs that knowledge can pay the machine owners for it instead of paying a human. Anyone who needs performance of actions that require this knowledge, needs a machine that can perform those actions. Which makes delivery of various services, such as medical and legal, safe for as long as hallucinations happen.
If the machine knows all the stuff, you people don't.
The thesis of the article is that knowing stuff is not useful when the machine knows it for us.
But the topic is worth considering. If a machine has university-graduate level understanding of knowledge, anyone who needs that knowledge can pay the machine owners for it instead of paying a human. Anyone who needs performance of actions that require this knowledge, needs a machine that can perform those actions. Which makes delivery of various services, such as medical and legal, safe for as long as hallucinations happen.
If the machine knows all the stuff, you people don't.