On: Show HN: Transductive regular expressions for text...

[danielparks]

This is a matter of operator precedence and tokenization. Tokens are single characters in this language, and there is an invisible operator between them.

If the operator were explicit (let’s call it ~), the example would look like this:

    $ echo 'cat' | trre 'c:d~a:o~t:g'
    dog

With unnecessary parentheses:

    $ echo 'cat' | trre '(c:d)~(a:o)~(t:g)'
    dog

[c0nstantine → danielparks]

That's true. Thank you for elaborating.

There is a hidden operator of concatenation as for usual regular expressions. In the code I denote it as lower dot '.' (as in the old Thompson's implementation).