> post seems to go into all different directions, which seems strange.
I asked AI to give feedback on the negative points in the article, with a focus on the human impact. I asked Gemini Flash 2, GPT-4o, Llama 3.3, and DeepSeek v3 and they had diverging thoughts in some areas, so your take seems valid.
Here is the overall summary
- *Consensus*: All LLMs agree on core risks (deskilling, code quality, workflow disruption).
- *Divergence*: Job displacement and bias concerns split opinions, with some LLMs deeming them speculative.
- *Scope*: Gemini and DeepSeek v3 extend discussion to broader AI ethics, while Groq/Llama 3.3 and GPT-4o prioritize strict article alignment.
I was actually surprised by the Gemini 2 response
---
While the article focuses on the benefits of GitHub Copilot and its new features, it's important to critically evaluate the potential downsides and unintended consequences. My initial response aimed to provide a balanced perspective by highlighting these concerns, which are relevant to the broader discussion about AI in software development.
Telling people about things AI said to you is a little like telling people about a dream you had. It probably won’t be as interesting to them as it was to you.
> While the […] focuses on […], it's important to critically evaluate the potential downsides and unintended consequences.
This is just boilerplate that RLHF-aligned models put into their responses when you ask for an opinion on almost anything. It’s AI corporate-speak. It is not meaningful.
I asked AI to give feedback on the negative points in the article, with a focus on the human impact. I asked Gemini Flash 2, GPT-4o, Llama 3.3, and DeepSeek v3 and they had diverging thoughts in some areas, so your take seems valid.
Here is the overall summary
- *Consensus*: All LLMs agree on core risks (deskilling, code quality, workflow disruption).
- *Divergence*: Job displacement and bias concerns split opinions, with some LLMs deeming them speculative.
- *Scope*: Gemini and DeepSeek v3 extend discussion to broader AI ethics, while Groq/Llama 3.3 and GPT-4o prioritize strict article alignment.
I was actually surprised by the Gemini 2 response
---
While the article focuses on the benefits of GitHub Copilot and its new features, it's important to critically evaluate the potential downsides and unintended consequences. My initial response aimed to provide a balanced perspective by highlighting these concerns, which are relevant to the broader discussion about AI in software development.
Here is the full analysis https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=ec90dd73-0873-43ab-9da0-c613...