Every batch, many founders get rejected due to basic application mistakes, missing key criteria that YC partners explicitly look for. We learned this the hard way, which is why we built YC Score.
Simply upload your draft PDF or fill out our YC-mirrored form. Our AI analyzes your responses against 25 critical factors that can make or break your application, from technical credentials to market validation. For instance, when YC partner Dalton Caldwell notes that teams with technical founders have "5x better odds," you need to know before submitting. YC Score flags these deal-breakers and shows you how to fix them, drawing from YC partners' insights, successful founders' experiences, and official YC guidance.
We initially built YC Score for ourselves. While it's still evolving, it helps teams avoid costly mistakes. Help us make it better by sharing your feedback :)
Oh, and we made a video for it: Surviving YC 25... Squid Game Style:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dw_-wZOcUU
> For instance, when YC partner Dalton Caldwell notes that teams with technical founders have "5x better odds," you need to know before submitting. YC Score flags these deal-breakers and shows you how to fix them
There is no "fixing" that issue. My guess is that teams with technical cofounders do 5x better because they have the tools they need to succeed and the drive and passion to do so. If your tool said "Sorry, you've got 3 non-technical cofounders", and you think your solution is "oh, quick let's go get a technical cofounder", you're probably extremely unlikely to go up to that 5x success rate because you didn't have the "organic coming together" of technical cofounders in the first place.
This is classic Goodhart's Law.