Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Especially now that the US has moved to a first-to-file system, there's no guarantee that the patent holder is the inventor. Separately from that, some patent troll companies file obvious, overbroad patents without implementing them (e.g. the classic case being doing <X> on the Internet, of course) to build up their stockpile. Just because they might end up with some patents when their junk sticks doesn't make them an inventor.


How is that different from first-to-invent system?

Concept of prior-art still exists in first-to-file system.


That is what I meant by "shouldn't have been granted in the first place"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: