Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think what is more likely to happen is people just start considering the home disposable in disaster prone areas. The land is most of the value so if you can afford to finance the cost of construction in some way, you don’t even need disaster insurance coverage to stomache the one wildfire or hurricane, if that, that might actually directly strike your property over your ownership.


Isn't this the Japanese approach to homes? They are basically disposable after X years and part of that is related to natural disasters somehow?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: