Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> So the distinction is moot.

From the perspective of an applicant's emotional response, sure, but it's absolutely relevant in order to have a conversation about how to solve it since the different causes may need different approaches, or may occur in sufficiently differing rates to influence which should be addressed first.




The distinction is also moot from perspective of an individuals's time being cavalierly wasted by a large corporation.


Just wait until you start thinking about dating.

But if we’re claiming fraud, either way the intent is actually the deciding factor. You can’t commit fraud without a guilty mind (mens rea)- at least in any jurisdiction I’m aware of.


Modern dating sucks, but at least half the time there's a real human on the other side that isn't a corporation trying to sell me something.

And yes, that's what audits are for. To deduce intent by investigating from within, something we could never do.


nah, fake profiles are a huge problem. depending on the site, it could easily be 1 to 5 real:fake or more.


I did say 1 in 2 weren't bots. I wouldn't say that's great in any measure when your goal is some form of companionship.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: