Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> therefore tests are more suited to volatile software development practices.

And having no tests is even more suited...






Maybe there are tradeoffs. If the code will never need the same thing again manual tests are good enough. Most code has things that don't change even as you add new features and so tests are valuable.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: