I agree that there needs to be a better standard than just “more likely than not”. Freedom of expression is a fundamental good, and there should be clear evidence of harm outweighing that good, before curtailing it.
Regarding my previous comment, my intent was to point out the GP comment’s position (because the parent’s comment seemed to be beside the point), not necessarily to endorse it.
Regarding my previous comment, my intent was to point out the GP comment’s position (because the parent’s comment seemed to be beside the point), not necessarily to endorse it.