Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

CEOs should to be held responsible





Last time someone held a CEO truly responsible he was arrested.

I nonetheless agree CEOs should be held responsible.


The CEO is primarily responsible to [maximize profits for] shareholders, not necessarily to benefit patients. If shareholders wish for better care to be provided to patients, I’m sure they would be happy to accept a lower rate of return on their investment.

It's almost like profits shouldn't be part of the equation when we are talking about humans lives and health.

Noone should enrich themselves on others not getting the health care they need, and those who do it today are morally bankrupt -- and society should fight back.


You're painting a picture of CEOs and their investors as an ontological evil, not by choice, but by unavoidable virtue of their role.

This could've been searing satire, had you intended it that way.


Morality doesn't stop applying just because you agreed to accept money in exchange for hurting people.

I recommend reading Built to Last

https://www.amazon.com/Built-to-Last-Jim-Collins-audiobook/d...

It'll do a much better job than I can in showing why your thinking is so wrong-headed


Are you saying the shareholders should be held responsible then? Isn't taking responsibility the reason that the CEO is being paid by them?

Shareholders of publicly traded businesses have governance power; they can vote for or against board members and policy documents.

Perhaps this is one of the concerns with the rise of index funds— fewer investors make use of their governance power and the index funds just vote according to the recommendations of the current board.


Oh okay, system is working as intended and there are no problems!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: