Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> From Russia it looks like that Europe is at Putin's throat supplying enormous amount of armaments and military equipment to the Ukraine, and helping them with the intelligence.

The solution to this problem is straightforward. Putin can get out of Ukraine. All of it.

Simple to do, easy to achieve. No more Russians or North Koreans need to die.






> The solution to this problem is straightforward. Putin can get out of Ukraine.

Or Ukraine can surrender. "Simple" to do, "easy" to achieve, no more Ukrainians need to die.

Disclaimer: I'm not suggesting Ukraine should surrender. I'm saying both Ukraine's surrender and the Russian pull-out are equally hard to do from their respective perspectives.


Only from a very sterile perspective, divorced from humanity.

Consider what it would sound like if you applied this logic to any perpetrator/victim situation, like a rape for example.


[flagged]


[flagged]


You should have said "any victim but Crimea" then.

Ukraine limiting irrigation water to Crimea is peanuts compared to historical examples such as Free French Air Force participating in months of severe bombing of road and rail networks, bridges, railyards and other critical infrastructure of occupied France in preparation for the Normandy landings.

Or to to cite a more recent example, like the Russian armed forces mudering thousands of its "own" people in the siege of Mariupol (these being the 80 percent or so of the population who were Russian speaking, across the 5k-20k civilians estimated to have been killed). And damaging or destroying 90 percent of the buildings they used to live and work in.

Ukraine is obligated to provide water for farming in a territory seized by their imperialistic neighbour?

Go complain to HR at the troll farm.

I'm saying both Ukraine's surrender and the Russian pull-out are equally hard to do from their respective perspectives.

Which is completely ludicrous, of course.

For Ukraine, "surrender" means accepting permanent occupation and subjugation.

For Russia, it means they get egg on their face, basically. It will just go back to its corner and sulk for a while. Definitely very doable, as it's something they've done many times in the past.

There's simply no comparison.

And there's no symmetry at all between the two sides in this conflict.


I said: "from their respective perspectives" - that is, subjectively. You're talking about objective facts. I don't disagree with you, but you're also not (visibly) disagreeing with me: we're discussing two entirely different things. Objectively, an egg on your face is not comparable to subjugation. Subjectively, there might be people willing to die or kill at the mere sight of an egg - it would be dangerous to put an egg on their faces.

Drawing a caricature of a prophet and killing the author of the caricature is objectively not equivalent or comparable. Subjectively, though, you'll find people willing to kill the author and get killed or jailed for life for it.

People and societies have beliefs and values that differ. Without understanding the adversaries' beliefs, no agreement is possible. If no agreement is possible, the only way out is to eradicate one side. It might work out for Israel, but it is impossible in Ukraine.

In any case, I just want people to stop killing each other. I don't think one-sided demands (no matter how objectively justified and no matter which side they originate from) will help end it. Russians won't "just" "simply" pull out, and Ukraine won't "just" surrender.


> Without understanding the adversaries' beliefs, no agreement is possible.

Putin believes Ukraine is not a real country and Ukrainians are not a real people. No agreement is possible when that is his attitude.

> I don't think one-sided demands

There is only one side. This is one of the least ambiguous wars in history.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: