Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
[flagged] OpenAI is Lehman Brothers: A crash is coming (sherwood.news)
17 points by NN88 14 days ago | hide | past | favorite | 19 comments



This site has published a bunch of "OpenAI is [famous company]" articles today, each with a different thesis.

OpenAI is Taco Bell: https://sherwood.news/tech/openai-is-taco-bell/

OpenAI is Pixar: https://sherwood.news/tech/openai-is-pixar/

OpenAI is Napster: https://sherwood.news/tech/openai-is-napster/

OpenAI is Salesforce: https://sherwood.news/tech/openai-is-salesforce/

And so on. They're all listed here: https://sherwood.news/tech/what-companys-past-reveals-the-fu...


I understand the hook of these articles; not just from that site, but from almost the entire publishing industry and the allure of OpenAI. But we’re reaching strange new levels. What’s next? OpenAI is Númenor, OpenAI is Windows Vista, OpenAI is John Carter, OpenAI is Fyre Festival...

:)


Only thing left to do is use ChatGPT to generate random "OpenAI is X" articles.


OpenAI is Tom Bombadil by Christopher Hitchens: https://pastebin.com/ZX2gpKa5

OpenAI is Lucha Libre by Michael Lewis: https://pastebin.com/PE2uqgc2

OpenAI is a Pop Tart by Hunter S Thompson: https://pastebin.com/q0bVWpSG

OpenAI is a Bacon-Wrapped Hotdog Left Out in the Sun Too Long by Papa Smurf: https://pastebin.com/CDYcnRpS

Someone should make a Custom GPT.


I'm inclined to flag these as they should really be one article, or what should be linked to from HN should be a link to some directory for all these articles.


All from different guest authors, so may be more editorial gimmick than SEO play. Walt Hickey is a respected writer/editor.

It's definitely one way to hedge your bets.


it is an editorial thing. from the last link

> What company’s past reveals the future of OpenAI?

> Sherwood asked a baker’s dozen of writers to make their best case for what’ll happen to the most important company of 2024: OpenAI.


"Sherwood asked a baker’s dozen of writers to make their best case for what’ll happen to the most important company of 2024: OpenAI."


The thing that made Lehman Brothers Lehman Brothers was not that they had a bad business model (the article says so much). It was that they were a central player in a network of financial products that were poorly understood that redistributed risk in a way even less understood. So when the music stopped markets froze because nobody knew who was solvent and who wasn't.

Hard to see what the equivalent in the OpenAI scenario is. Presumably when the music stops a bunch of VCs lose their shirts, the three trillion companies become ordinary trillion dollar companies and silicon valley moves on to look for the next big thing. Probably way more comparable to the dotcom bust.


All these AI services are a great value for the money. I can’t believe that it’s profitable in any way. It seems to me anecdotally that once some market share is reached prices will skyrocket.

I don’t think the barrier to entry is big enough to make this scaling model suitable.


> It seems to me anecdotally that once some market share is reached prices will skyrocket.

Competition determines pricing, and all LLM providers have to compete with "free" open-source solutions. There is no moat to justify increasing costs.

Some argue that having the best model is a moat (it's not by the economic definition), but even then, permissively-licensed OSS LLMs are catching up since there is a slowdown, and anyone can host them.


The market determines pricing, but if the cost of queries exceeds what they can collect in revenue, it is unsustainable. Is it similar to the VC driven craze where gig systems were super cheap until they weren't? Maybe! "It’s easy to sell dollar bills for ninety cents."


I do not think an AI crash will come close to the damage the mortgage crisis of 2008 did.

But, I agree a crash is coming and it will probably mirror the dot-com crash. The only question is Nvidia, I think Nvidia has potential to cause a lot of pain.


If Nvidia goes back to "only" the size it was before AI it would still be a great company. But the market will probably overreact and crush it 95%.


Nvidia is 6.73% of the S&P 500


People said the same thing about Uber, but they're still running


in the United States, any business which can pull of scenario where a small group of rich people is exploiting large group of poor people is never going to fail - hence Uber is not a good comparison :)


Is this something specific to the United States, isn't this how most of the world works?


I am no financial expert but this all feels spot on.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: