Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There's the perception that it's an "either" question. When in reality its both.

Home solar is a big win, and if nothing else allows capital to be sourced from a million home owners.

Centralized solar is a big win, generating grid power Erich is obviously important.

It's not a question of either, it's a question of both.




I should have made it clear: I’m referring to people who are adamantly opposed to large solar installations, apparently because it’s a threat to agriculture? It’s very odd, but I see yard signs and bumper stickers everywhere in rural Indiana.


Do you think some farms in rural Indiana will make more money by converting to a solar power park? I could imagine it, and I could imagine that some people would feel threatened by this change.


Sure, but follow the money: unsurprisingly it’s the usual big money bad actors who are funding opposition.

https://energyandpolicy.org/fossil-fuel-funding-opposition-r...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: