Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So now that a lot of books used for studying literature will become freely available, I wonder how long it's going to be before the syllabus "needs revising"



High schools still teach Shakespeare and that's always been in the public domain. As is a lot of Mark Twain's works.


Somewhat tangential, but it makes me nuts that my son's small high school, that is always struggling for money, pays stupid amounts for Disney scripts for the school plays instead of doing Shakespeare or any of the other public domain plays out there.


> pays stupid amounts for Disney scripts

How much do they pay exactly? Does it come out of a specific program’s budget, eg drama? Just curious.

To play a devil’s advocate:

Perhaps the plays generate some money for the school or the drama program. Disney might draw a larger audience.

Also, for better or worse (probably worse), Disney is “safe” and designed for mass appeal.

Small schools probably have a harder time with these sorts of decisions. Ideally, a school might encourage adaptations of classics, to foster deeper understanding and creativity (as well as to ensure that there aren’t too many “re-runs”, furthering student and audience interest). But a larger student populace makes that easier via access to more ideas, more interest, more hands.


They pay about $1K per production. It's certainly not making them any money, as the ticket sales amount to about $500 total, and that money is coming from parents and family who would be paying the $5 ticket price no matter what is on stage. Nobody else is attending these plays. I think the main reason they're doing it is because it is what most the kids want to do, especially because it is a combine high school/middle school play so there are younger kids in it.

At least this year, they let the seniors pick the play and completely run the show. They're still paying about a grand for the rights, but they did make a more interesting choice, "The Crucible".


Since Disney classics often riffed off public domain works, the school conceivably might have gone straight to the source.


As someone who has been involved with both, it’s substantially easier to work with high school kids from the Disney script vs Shakespeare.

A good working copy of Shakespeare is going to run some money just for copies.


It's easier for the same reason that in 500 years no one will watch or have heard of any of Disney's products, and people will still be reading and performing Shakespeare wherever English is spoken.


Maybe the argument is accessibility, Disney is much more approachable and likely to get the kids invested and involved than Shakespeare and is worth the cost?

Or they could just do Hamlet with Lions


Arguably impoverishing the students, too. The impulse to pander to keep both the kids and parents interested is too strong, I guess.


How much do they spend?


Not only that, but what GP is suggesting would require schools to have a reasonable, sizeable budget. Schools provide most of that reading material, so they'd have to be the party responsible for buying all of the new, copyrighted books.

A fairly laughable idea if you follow the general trend of school budgets...


Schools love nothing more than wasting money on unnecessary trash they get sold by their distributors, choose your own reasons for why that is in spite of ever-loudening complaints of budget constraint. How else could not just one but multiple full length textbooks on Algebra 1 get written, published and distributed every year?


Why? Most books you read in lit class aren't part of a textbook. You just buy the Dover Thrift edition of some book for $2.99 and read that. Or a used copy, or the Gutenberg e-text. Nobody at the school makes any money on it.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: