Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That makes complete sense. For me, the time investment is totally neutral. I would buy a water filter anyway to mitigate other harms. Using stainless steel utensils vs plastic ones doesn't cost me any time at all. So I have risk reduced with 0 time investment.





Stainless steel, aluminum, and brass includes lead, chromium, nickel, etc. at far higher concentrations. [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-024-00686-7#ref-CR1]

At least most stainless steel has low leachate levels, it seems like cheap/scrap stainless steel is the biggest offender.


Thank you for sharing that information about aluminum and brass cookware; I wasn’t aware of those details before.

The study you referenced does confirm the findings for aluminum and brass, but it also notes that no stainless steel cookware tested released enough lead to exceed childhood or adult Interim Reference Levels (IRLs). The testing involved placing vinegar—an acidic substance—and leaving it there for 24 hours, yet even under these conditions, stainless steel did not surpass IRL thresholds for lead.

I think what you are saying here is that avoidance of lead even below threshold is important and that plastic or silicone could have even lower amounts of lead in it. Which is fair and I think important to realize there is no perfect answer here.


In terms of cooking utensils silicone or bamboo might be a better choice than stainless steel. I don't think I've ever seen brass cooking stuff. I've often seen brass bowls with stickers warning that they aren't food safe.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: