But they have been provided with true facts: that the candidate is actually backed by Russia, and that the supposedly "true" facts that they were provided were in fact not true facts.
The election has still been influenced for sure, but it's a false statement to say that voters have no new information.
Do you have a reliable source for those facts? Because there’s a lot of newspaper articles and allegedly some report from the Romanian spooks and I wouldn’t call any of those facts.
If they have a trial and if they prove corruption then that’s fair and square. Right now we’re in the “journalists and rival politicians accuse” phase.
The election has still been influenced for sure, but it's a false statement to say that voters have no new information.