On: Handling cookies is a minefield

[Macha]

> nobody has ever taken the time to write an RFC with supporting arguments.

https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3243-packages-as-optional-n...

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3243

[littlestymaar → Macha]

Exactly, this isn't about “default namespace”, this is the other feature which I said had support (didn't know the RFC had been merged though, thanks for pointing that out).

This isn't the kind of namespace people say they want to prevent squatting.