> Sorry but for some ballance, the current prime minister stood in parliament and opposed the entire HS2 project "on cost and merit" and voted against the project in 2016. He said "the only sensible plan is to abandon the project altogether".
That 2016 vote was the decision. Yes and no were both valid answers at that point ("no" was a bad one, but a defensible one). The subsequent dicking about is a whole lot worse than either.
That 2016 vote was the decision. Yes and no were both valid answers at that point ("no" was a bad one, but a defensible one). The subsequent dicking about is a whole lot worse than either.