> I'm of the opinion human reasoning is really just "pattern matching"
There are more interpretations of "pattern matching".
Of course it seems a fundamental component of generating ideas, but then those ideas are put - by intellectuals - on a bench and criticized actively. The two activities have important differences. First you look and go "they seem four", but then you count to be sure.
The second part is absolutely critical to determine a well working reasoner.
There are more interpretations of "pattern matching".
Of course it seems a fundamental component of generating ideas, but then those ideas are put - by intellectuals - on a bench and criticized actively. The two activities have important differences. First you look and go "they seem four", but then you count to be sure.
The second part is absolutely critical to determine a well working reasoner.