Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I’m pretty sure Judges consider whether such terms are within certain bounds of reason… they can be expected to annul terms such as ‘the customer has to offer their first born son as a sacrifice’ or ‘the customer has to pay a billion dollars in compensation’, etc...



Those are just unconscionable terms, not merely unexpected ones.


And who would be the authority deciding on the definition of those two terms, if not judges?

Clearly HN users cannot posses that authority without a fairly significant rank.


It's not like I'm telling you to trust me on definitions. Just look up how it's been applied in the past. It's been a much, much higher bar historically.


Judges aren’t automatons, they won’t self combust after deciding differently…




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: