I'm not really convinced of the "economy" argument. It's easy to make, but there is no reason to think that the other guy is actually any better. They may not be thrilled with where they are now, but they were not noticeably better off four years ago.
Some are worse off; some are better; many are about the same. It's just not sufficient to explain electing a literal criminal.
I'm sure it figures in somewhere, but I don't think it's anywhere near enough to explain the situation.
Some are worse off; some are better; many are about the same. It's just not sufficient to explain electing a literal criminal.
I'm sure it figures in somewhere, but I don't think it's anywhere near enough to explain the situation.