Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I understand their intentions. I understand that these votes come out of a place of fear. They are unhappy and a lying demagogue is pointing them to a solution and fuels them with hate. [1]

I also understand that they willfully choose to ignore massive red flags and are a bunch of hypocrites. These people have no shame and need to be shamed. It is the key emotion that leads to change and motivates to action.

Sadly, due to electoral interference by totalitarian regimes, media outlets, Musk, and the internet in general, these people who would otherwise be ostracized by the community due to their antisocial behaviours have been normalized.

Once you're set up like that, it's extremely difficult to get out of. I am afraid that the US has check-mated itself for at least an entire generation. The only thing that can drive a change is hope and basic human decency, ethics and morality.

Which brings us back to people wilfully being the exact opposites of those values. We've had lying oppressive demagogues probably since the dawn of humanity. Most certainly in the last century.

However, despite being afraid and frustrated, many people sided against such leaders. And this is why I consider not doing so a personal moral failing.

[1] https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/11/trump-voters-li...




> These people have no shame and need to be shamed. It is the key emotion that leads to change and motivates to action.

> these people who would otherwise be ostracized by the community due to their antisocial behaviours have been normalized.

The Internet (or global communication in general) does indeed mean shame won't work, because people can just ignore you and go find people who support them - whether that's Trump, Musk, or some randoms on the Internet is irrelevant.

So let's double down on the shame thing, which has worked out so well lately?

> The only thing that can drive a change is hope and basic human decency, ethics and morality.

I think the crux of many social issues is that people have different ideas about what 'basic human decency, ethics and morality' even mean.


> I think the crux of many social issues is that people have different ideas about what 'basic human decency, ethics and morality' even mean.

Everybody knows that lying, stealing, swindling, rape, misogyny, selfishness, narcissism, taking pride in ignorance and probably a dozen more wouldn't make that list. Everybody.

People vote for who they identify with as this gives legitimacy and backing to their own views and behaviours.


Morality is not universally as simple as 'stealing is bad' - a basic lesson in ethics, really. Is it bad to steal food for your starving family? If your answer is a simple 'yes', then I applaud you your certainty in life. I wish I had that. But for me, and many others, things aren't quite that simple.

In any case, I wasn't really referring to things like those on your list (one of those things is really not like the others, by the way. Seems very bad faith to me) but more things like trans issues, immigration, welfare, etc.


My point is – how can you trust someone who says that they'll fix your issues if they have a track record of being an opportunistic pathological liar?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: