Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Seems like it would be a lot more accessible for a lot of people if it were a set of HTML pages.

I expect that whatever was used to create the PDF could be configured to produce a website...




also on a webpage you would be able to filter it by available tools/knowledge


Or not. Maybe you'd get "infinite scroll". Or some other modern webdev bullshit that's strictly inferior to PDF (or plain HTML) and CTRL+F.

I'm actually surprised by the anti-PDF sentiment here (in general case, not necessarily this book). Modern web is so bad, that almost every day I end up on some page that would be strictly better if it were a PDF. So, to play devil's advocate, PDFs are cool because:

- The links may rot, but they remain, and so does surrounding content. Once you get a PDF, no one can take it away from you.

- It's self-contained. It can easily be transferred between devices and read without an Internet connection.

- It's a file. Yes, it's important to mention because in 2024, files cannot be taken for granted.

- Rich format without spurious dynamics and other web nonsense. Sure, PDFs technically can run arbitrary JavaScript, but hardly any reader supports that.

- Can't track you or spy on you (theoretically it could, in practice, see previous point).

I could come up with a few more. Point being, you could do worse, and modern web quite often is worse.

As for what could be an even better format, my mind is drawn towards CHM[0]. You know, like the help files in old Windows software. A self-contained file built of interlinked HTML pages, complete with index and internal search/xref. Kind of a better EPUB[1].

(Ironically, marketers should actually love PDF - total control over presentation is exactly what they've been trying to gain on the web all these years.)

--

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Compiled_HTML_Help

[1] - Despite being a decade older.


I guess the sentiment is because

a) it cannot be automatically reflowed

b) it’s a complete mess of a file format with tech deb spanning 30 years

c) the linked ressources info

Everything else is fine with it and apparently lotta folks write plenty of software to read it.

Perhaps epubs (and .mobi etc) come close but they are not universally adopted


I do agree, especially on

- It's self-contained. It can easily be transferred between devices and read without an Internet connection. - It's a file. Yes, it's important to mention because in 2024, files cannot be taken for granted.

(Btw it’s a sad state of affairs that we can less and less own our files)

But I do think in the post here, the issue is that the PDF in itself is pretty useless : it doesn’t contain any information and only links to … websites.

(Btw I wouldn’t criticize this a lot because I’m admirative of the indexation work, it’s pretty cool !)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: