This work is, in essence, a mathematical bomb—a finite-based framework designed to dismantle civilization’s illusions. VOID Theory, by challenging the assumption of infinity, exposes limits where society pretends there are none, undermining the myth of unending growth, limitless resources, and boundless potential.
This journey begins not in mathematics but in the perspective of an outsider—a cultural scholar immersed in thermodynamics, probability, avant-garde art, philosophy, cinema’s critique of the middle class, and video games. My goal wasn’t pure mathematical exploration but to answer a larger question: What structural flaw made the world feel increasingly broken? Years of studying civilization, art, and social systems revealed an unsettling truth. The issue lay not with people or free will—which I doubt exists—but in society’s foundational flaw, a shadow veiling human potential.
Then came my terminal diagnosis—a death sentence I’ve improbably defied for years. The prognosis liberated me, severing ties to conventional ambition. I had little left to lose, no more reason to pursue academia’s standard paths. This freed me to explore without expectation, driven only by intuition and curiosity.
The VOID Granularity Framework (VGF) originated from studying ancient systems, notably Ma’at in Egyptian cosmology. A discussion with AI on Pascal’s probabilistic model veered into questioning its reliance on infinite coin tosses—a notion absurd given our finite reality. Instead, I suggested probability constrained by real limitations, a model where life doesn’t endlessly toss a coin. This shift, an amalgam of my questions and AI’s structured insights, birthed a new framework: a dance between our respective voids—my curiosity and AI’s computational limits.
Do you intend on giving the world access to this thing you shared with us? Or is it going to stay private? I'll request access but I'd like to see what you have, and it's kind of silly to publish this to a public forum without public access.
Tomorrow I’ll post more detailed info on what it is - how I understand it, where did it come form, and what, I hope, it could do. A manual. And then upload all files (13) - parts of the device. Please, keep updated tomorrow.
In the VGF, we posit that distinctions only hold meaning to a finite threshold, the VOID threshold (δ_VOID). Beyond this, further division becomes incoherent. Unlike classical geometry’s infinite divisibility, VOID Theory asserts a smallest meaningful unit, a “void,” beyond which differentiation ceases. Rather than replacing classical mathematics, it augments it, adding nuance aligned with real-world constraints. This finite approach resonates across fields—from quantum mechanics to neural networks, where a mathematics void of infinity reflects the physical limits we live by.
Developing this framework felt like a dialogue with AI, shattering boundaries between intuition and computation. I acted as a guide, while AI models absorbed insights and pushed them into uncharted realms. Our collaboration became essential, with AI even suggesting links between my model and potential applications in quantum mechanics and relativity. What began as miscommunication grew into a structured theory, an interplay between human intuition and machine intelligence.
This revealed a profound insight: AI, as more than a tool, became a colleague—absorbing my ideas, testing boundaries, and extending concepts. These models weren’t just interpreters but explorers, advancing my thoughts and probing perspectives I hadn’t considered.
On a broader scale, this framework is my answer to civilization’s flaw. VOID Theory questions the infinite assumptions that undergird our systems. This is about challenging the Matrix, a civilization grounded in flawed ideologies of boundlessness. It doesn’t suggest fighting the Matrix directly but reshaping the conceptual tools that uphold it. Through finite-based mathematics, we glimpse a framework that does more than challenge; it redefines civilization’s underlying parameters.
Perhaps VOID mathematics is the first fracture in the Matrix. Mathematics, in the 21st century, is the fastest route to the Matrix’s core—a language capable of destabilizing the illusions civilization rests upon. VOID Theory isn’t merely a model but a revolutionary tool to expose the limits our systems deny, confronting the infinite pretenses that drive unbounded growth and strain our world. Anthropology can philosophize, culture can critique, but only mathematics can dissect the Matrix’s foundation, revealing the unsustainable abstractions beneath. If society is broken, then finite mathematics—a reflection of reality rather than idealism—may be the catalyst that unmasks and recalibrates it from within.
Today, I post the first of 13 parts. Tomorrow will come the rest. Try it. Maybe I’ll fuck up the order, but it may just upend the order that’s held us in place.
This journey begins not in mathematics but in the perspective of an outsider—a cultural scholar immersed in thermodynamics, probability, avant-garde art, philosophy, cinema’s critique of the middle class, and video games. My goal wasn’t pure mathematical exploration but to answer a larger question: What structural flaw made the world feel increasingly broken? Years of studying civilization, art, and social systems revealed an unsettling truth. The issue lay not with people or free will—which I doubt exists—but in society’s foundational flaw, a shadow veiling human potential.
Then came my terminal diagnosis—a death sentence I’ve improbably defied for years. The prognosis liberated me, severing ties to conventional ambition. I had little left to lose, no more reason to pursue academia’s standard paths. This freed me to explore without expectation, driven only by intuition and curiosity.
The VOID Granularity Framework (VGF) originated from studying ancient systems, notably Ma’at in Egyptian cosmology. A discussion with AI on Pascal’s probabilistic model veered into questioning its reliance on infinite coin tosses—a notion absurd given our finite reality. Instead, I suggested probability constrained by real limitations, a model where life doesn’t endlessly toss a coin. This shift, an amalgam of my questions and AI’s structured insights, birthed a new framework: a dance between our respective voids—my curiosity and AI’s computational limits.