Rule one for reading headlines: the relationship between each component of a sentence is often not what you would expect.
In this example, an understandable misreading might be that the astronauts who rode in the Starliner to the ISS returned. In actuality, this set of astronauts' [0] only relationship with Starliner is that their time at ISS overlapped with Starliner. The former crew of Starliner is still planned to return with the subsequent mission [1].
Well, Crew 8 was also delayed by the Starliner issue. [0] Just not by nearly as much as the flight test crew!
So I think the headline is accurate, but still misleading because there are two crews that the headline could (eventually) refer to — one where there's basically no story that anyone is interested in (Crew 8) and another where the story is full of drama and closely watched (flight test crew).
In this example, an understandable misreading might be that the astronauts who rode in the Starliner to the ISS returned. In actuality, this set of astronauts' [0] only relationship with Starliner is that their time at ISS overlapped with Starliner. The former crew of Starliner is still planned to return with the subsequent mission [1].
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Crew-8
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Crew-9