> A fair chunk of their output (that I saw) was commentary on other stuff (performers/performances/other) which is pretty much commodity content for easy consumption, not really art¹.
In what way is this excluded from being art? These are overlapping categories.
I do get your point. However, this might be incidental to the art they want to produce rather than central to their project.
In what way is this excluded from being art? These are overlapping categories.
I do get your point. However, this might be incidental to the art they want to produce rather than central to their project.