Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If Cloudflare offer a product, for a particular purpose, that breaks existing conventions of that purpose, then it’s Cloudflare.





Not really. You wouldn’t complain to a fence company for blocking a path if there were hired to do exactly that

Yes, I would. Experts are expected to relay back to their client with their thoughts on a matter, not just blindly do as they're told. Your builder is meant to do their due diligence, which includes making recommendations.

They are enablers. They get part of the blame.

Well it doesn’t break the conventions of the purpose they offer it for. Cloudflare attempts to block non-human users, and this is supposed to be used for human-readable websites. If someone puts cloudflare in front of a RSS feed, that’s user error. It’s like someone putting a captcha in front of an API and then complaining that the Captcha provider is breaking conventions.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: