Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

[flagged]



Well yes but it's kinda crappy that you do. Can easily imagine an alternate reality where laws are more pro-consumer such that it's illegal to charge someone for a service in a month that they don't use it.

> Can easily imagine an alternate reality where laws are more pro-consumer such that it's illegal to charge someone for a service in a month that they don't use it

Didn't use my vacation home this month, skipping the mortgage payments!


The comparison with a house does not work, it relies on a misapplication of the word "use". In the context of a house, "use" refers to ownership. You receive the benefits (use) of ownership regardless of your presence. You basically pay for the inability for others to live on the property.

That's not at all the same.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: