On: CRLF is obsolete and should be abolished

[nsnshsuejeb]

No need. Just convince the king (e.g. Google for HTTP) to make a tweak in the next standard version.

[vitus → nsnshsuejeb]

Good news! Both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 use a packed binary representation for headers, so CRLF is nowhere to be found in RFC 9113 / 9114.

I don't see value in picking on Google or HTTP here, even if it is fashionable to do so.