Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

By forcing formal study of the mind into the constrained methods used for studying the physical world, it allows the government and profit/power seekers to be the only actors free to use the methods that work best.

I wonder if this is purely a coincidence.






What methods are appropriate but forbidden by this “forcing” (and what’s causing the forcing exactly?)

Methods that do not adhere to the scientific method.

The forcing is performed by culture. Think back to COVID, the effect was on full display in various forms during that spectacle. Or, pick most any war that gets substantial coverage in the media.

I'm unfairly picking on science here a bit, the problem is ideologies in general.


As in… what methods?

Psychological studies have to adhere to various controls and what not. "The method".

Put some smart people in charge of an ambitious psychedelic powered initiative...but they have no controls. Not science? Cannot be science?

It's somewhat like how hip hop influences and accelerates white cultural evolution. Do this idea, see what happens when I do it.


Can be science! Doesn’t have to be science! Science folks do exploratory studies all the time to get a sense of whether the tree is worth barking up before they do the hard work of proving it.

Psychedelic studies might not suit themselves to FDA gold standard double-blind clinical trial science, but science overall involves a really broad toolkit. Psychedelics aren’t the only kind of intervention that can’t be safely or effectively blinded, and there are methods that attempt to demonstrate an effect anyway.

It seems to be thanks to people trying stuff as well as rigorous scientific studies that psychedelics are having their present-day moment in the sun (thanks, MAPS et al!). (My favorite part was that time Alexandria Ocasio Cortez cosponsored a psychedelics bill with arch-conservative, retired Navy SEAL Dan Crenshaw)

Things can be valuable without science proving it—nobody’s coming after the local preacher or imam or rabbi or shaman demanding that they scientifically prove their ministerial insights. And lord help the busybody who comes at a retired Navy SEAL trying psychedelic therapy for their post-traumatic stress…

I wonder, though—does it seem to you that psychedelics should be industrialized? There’s a fine line between “legal” and “aggressively marketed by drug companies.”


I think they should be studied using the full spectrum of approaches and people available to us, not restricted (officially/rhetorically) to an ideologically constrained and confused discipline like science as it is (which is not the same as its scriptures teach).

Anyone is free to learn therapy skills and use them in their own lives, you're just not allowed to call it therapy.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: