Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Philosophy is often very well grounded, often annoyingly so. We gave up on it because it turns out you can create iPhones if you ignore the philosophical problem of induction, go do science instead, and assume the laws of physics won’t try and conspire against you.

Rather, I wonder if Psychology would be better thought of as something even less grounded than science. Something where we’re just are happy with an accumulation of stuff that’s happened to work well enough, without pretending that we’re hunting fundamental principles. Something like a profession: Engineering, Doctoring, that sort of stuff.






Why would the problem of induction prevent one from inventing things?

Also, where did you learn it was given up on, and that is the reason why?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: