So you interpret "is there any part of the Wordpress cluster of organizations that do not ultimately answer to Matt?" as being a YES or NO question?
I interpret it as a request for information about what is Matt's role in the ecosystem and I was gathering information to share about that.
However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is:
YES, there are various parts of the the Wordpress cluster of organizations that do not ultimately answer to Matt.
While I love the use of passive aggressive language, in this case, as it was originally written, "However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is: YES" causes some globule of confusion to the primary reader --
Is this to imply that the answer Yes to the question about Matt's control over the organizations named WordPress is _not_ in fact factual?
I interpret it as a request for information about what is Matt's role in the ecosystem and I was gathering information to share about that.
However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is: YES, there are various parts of the the Wordpress cluster of organizations that do not ultimately answer to Matt.