Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As far as i know, ethanol and all biofuels are/were a dead end. They were used purely for farmer subsidies and the energy independence was an excuse.


That doesn't sound right. If that were the case, why would people still be building biofuel factories, e.g. in Sweden?


In Sweden, I’m guessing it’s government backed greenwashing. This article (state sponsored site) strongly suggests biofuels have significantly reduced their carbon output:

https://smartcitysweden.com/focus-areas/mobility/biofuels/

But the numbers don’t add up. Instead, it looks like they’re simply burning less gas (biofuels or not):

https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/sweden


Trust the government and their experts though.


Literally a report from government experts:

"It is important to note that biofuel production and consumption, in and of itself, will not reduce GHG or conventional pollutant emissions, lessen petroleum imports, or alleviate pressure on exhaustible resources."


Which makes it even more ridiculous that governments subsidize ethanol for fuel.


Its only ridiculous if you view it as a subsidy for ethanol fuel rather than a subsidy for the corn industry. All the government is doing there is creating a market where one wouldn't otherwise exist.


> Its only ridiculous if you view it as a subsidy for ethanol fuel

I.e., what the government claims it to be.

Hence my sarcastic comment about trusting the government and its "experts".


what is the source?



That doesn’t necessarily mean you can trust government reports though. Take this Bush-era propaganda piece, for example:

https://www.energy.gov/articles/biofuels-greenhouse-gas-emis...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: