Indeed a no brainer. The best possible outcome would be that OpenAI gets sued in...

Sakos · 2024-09-26T17:07:05 1727370425

So no AI for anybody? I don't see how that's better.

consteval · 2024-09-26T18:35:52 1727375752

No you can have AI. Just pay a license for people's content if you want to use it in your orphan crushing machine.

It's what everyone else does. The entitlement has to stop.

Sakos · 2024-09-26T22:47:10 1727390830

That's just not feasible and you know it. That just means companies like Google and OpenAI (with billions of dollars from companies like MS and Apple) will monopolize AI. This isn't better for everybody else. It just means we're subject to the whims of these companies.

You're advocating for destroying all AI or ensuring a monopoly by corporations. Whose side are you actually on?

consteval · 2024-09-27T16:24:08 1727454248

> That's just not feasible and you know it

Irrelevant. The law does not care about feasibility of breaking it.

If I decide to run a hit man business, that's also infeasible. Dealing with the arrests and fines would be too much. The conclusion then is not to bend the law to make murder legal. The conclusion is my business is illegitimate, and it's the civic duty of my Country to make sure it fails.

> Whose side are you actually on?

The people making the content that corps are profiting big off of. They should pay a license.