Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is a bizarre take. Of course, no person is completely unknown to other individuals. While my neighbour may have access to that which allows him to make crude comments in the street, this is a physical limitation. It is not at all desirable that my house has information leakage. If it were feasible/cost effective to make my house completely soundproof I likely would.

The internet is different. There are trade offs to privacy just like the real world, but it is not physical. Encryption exists. It protects real people from real governments that feature oppressive regimes. It protects them _now_, not in some distant future where N protests, elections or uprises have toppled all government entities that abuse their power. This seems to be a lofty ideal that we should all trust each other, our governments, our isps, our web services.

I think the crucial part is choice. You are welcome to blog every wikipedia article you visit, or live stream every activity you partake in over Twitch. But this is not a requirement to use the internet.




This is it. It’s like comparing “being seen by others at a nudist beach” vs “being recorded for the whole world to watch forever.” Not the same.

Also a lot of people wouldn’t appreciate their neighbor talking (or even hearing) about them having sex.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: