Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Can someone explain why a single geolocated node makes sense for data storage? If there's a house fire for example, wouldn't all the data be lost?



I’m guessing that the 71 TiB is mostly used for media, as in, plex/jellyfin media, which is sad to loose but not unrecoverable. How would one ever store that much of personal data? I hope they have an off site backup for the all important unrecoverable data like family photos and whatnot.


I have about about 80TB (my wife's data and mine) backed up to LTO5 tape. It's pretty cheap to get refurb tape drives on ebay. I pay about $5.00/TB for tape storage, not including the ~$200 for the LTO drive and an HBA card, so it was pretty economical.


Wow that is surprisingly cheap actually.


I get email alerts from ebay for anything related to LTO-5, and I only buy the cheap used tapes. They are still fine, most of them are very low use, the tapes actually have a chip in them that stores usage data like a car's odometer, so you can know how much a tape has been used. So far I trust tapes more than I'd trust a refurb hard drive for backups. And I also really like that the tapes have a write-protect notch on them, so once I write my backup data, there's no risk of having a tape accidentally get erased, unlike if I plugged in a hard drive and maybe there's some ransomware virus that automatically fucks with any hard drive drive that gets plugged in. It's just one less thing to worry about.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: