Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Pretty sure it applies to Common Lisp itself too.


The corollary to Greenspun’s rule is that any sufficiently complicated Common Lisp program contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Prolog.


It would be fun if it was "half Prolog, half Common Lisp"


Well, the 'PAIP' book for sure does it, literally.


I've now used both professionally. I look forward to hopefully using both in the same project. Though not holding my breath.


yes but not recursively!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: