> Exact wording varied, but the claim was this: that 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity is protected by Indigenous peoples.
"Wtf?"
I'm a "conservationist" by virtue and inclination, and I had no idea these idiots were making such claims.
I will say there is an assault against the natural world, and the uncorrupted indigenous peoples are obviously caring for less diminished biodiversity.
Is this special interest science being used as a weapon of future exploitation?
"Americans are saying it's not such a big deal...", "yeah, the Americans are saying, science proved biodiversity and stay-the-f-out aren't the greatest causality to things still being there ..."
"Wtf?"
I'm a "conservationist" by virtue and inclination, and I had no idea these idiots were making such claims.
I will say there is an assault against the natural world, and the uncorrupted indigenous peoples are obviously caring for less diminished biodiversity.
Is this special interest science being used as a weapon of future exploitation?
"Americans are saying it's not such a big deal...", "yeah, the Americans are saying, science proved biodiversity and stay-the-f-out aren't the greatest causality to things still being there ..."