Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

isnt the difference that when you have an open dataset, you get many many more eyeballs, and some very passionate ones. and they can make it their hobby, unconstrained by day to day needs of a job. eh?



No. They have to know what they are doing.

Also imagine the false discovery rate of <whatever analysis you think you can do> with the thousands of products which exist in a grocery store!

“Ah look we found collusion in salty snacks between weeks 38 and 45 of 2022 in stores 1, 5 and 13!”

Even if you knew what analysis to do (and you don’t) you are going to end up crying wolf a million times and solving no problem at all.

Again - a worthy effort but the methods just don’t exist.


You get the top 100 most plausible hunches and then investigate further from there… why focus on proving something in the data itself?

Investigators work on hunches just fine if you pay them enough.


ok. i believe you, but hope that your maybe a bit overly pessimistic


> Even if you knew what analysis to do (and you don’t) you are going to end up crying wolf a million times and solving no problem at all.

Mocking the epistemic skills of others while engaging in literal soothsaying (stating facts about future events) shows how culturally conditioned North Americans have become regarding government wrong doing.

I don't expect these people to be successful in their primary goal, but an enticing second order effect is it could accidentally catalyze public interest in epistemology, logic, rhetoric, the nature of Human culture and cognition, and a variety of the other things that keep commoners locked in a sophisticated virtual reality without their awareness (in any sophisticated manner at least). Now that would make this whole game a lot more interesting, because it applies to everything.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: